How We Score

Methodology

Rule-based. Transparent. Confidence-rated.
The full scoring logic is revealed inside your report — not before.

Rule-Based
Not AI-generated. Every score is calculated from defined, documented logic.
Transparent
The scoring method is built on 5 dimensions. Each score includes a confidence level.
Confidence Rated
Every assessment comes with a confidence level. Honest uncertainty = trust.
Re-assessable
90-day re-assessment included. Your thinking is not static — we track evolution.
Section 1

The 5 Thinking Frames

Each frame measures a mental model that determines whether you become easier to commoditize or more highly differentiated. The exact questions, scoring logic, and frame-to-risk causal chain are inside your report — not published here.

Frame 1
Source of Value
Where does your relevance actually come from?
Frame 2
Learning Path
How do you move from where you are to where you need to be?
Frame 3
AI Relationship
Are you positioning defensively or offensively?
Frame 4
Security Source
What is your actual moat in a fast-changing market?
Frame 5
Knowledge vs Thinking
Are you accumulating data or generating insight?

The full frame scoring rubric — what each answer signals and why — is part of the Career Intelligence Report. It is not published publicly. Order the assessment to see exactly how you score and why.

Section 2

SA-AIRS™ Scoring

SA-AIRS™ (Sriram Advisory AI Risk Score) measures your AI displacement risk across 5 weighted dimensions. Your frame profile is one input. Role context, market conditions, and decision complexity also factor in.

1
Task Repetition
High Weight
2
Automation Feasibility
High Weight
3
Market Saturation
Medium Weight
4
Decision Complexity
High Weight
5
Human Dependency
Medium Weight

How these dimensions are scored, weighted, and combined — and why your specific thinking patterns drive your score in each — is explained in your personalised report. Not here.

Section 3

The 10% Ladder

L5
Expert
"I define what problems matter"
Highly differentiated
L4
Strategic
"I see patterns others miss"
Low exposure
L3
Applied
"I solve real problems"
Minimum strategic threshold
L2
Functional
"I execute what's specified"
Growing exposure
L1
Surface
"I know tools. I follow instructions."
High — AI has largely replaced this
Level 3 is the minimum strategic threshold — goal of the first 90-day challenge sequence
Honest Limitations

What This Is Not

!SA-AIRS™ scores are based on your self-reported inputs only — they reflect your perception, not an objective audit of your role.
!Thinking frame scores are directional, not clinical. They suggest patterns, not diagnoses.
!This assessment is not a substitute for professional career counselling, legal advice, financial advice, or mental health support.
!Career outcomes depend on many factors beyond thinking patterns: market conditions, organisational context, actual skill set, timing, and external circumstances.
Read the full legal disclaimer →

The rest is inside your report.

The full scoring logic, your frame-to-risk causal chain, and your 90-day challenge set are revealed only after your assessment. That's by design.

Get Your Assessment →